Media Trials In India Is The Echo Of Noise Suppressing The Rule Of Law On the one hand, the media has the right to freedom and on the other, the accused also has the right to life and personal liberty. keeping in mind the right to freedom of media, which includes the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to freedom of practising a profession, pre censorship of media in india is almost nil. The judgment pronounced by chief justice dipankar datta and justice g.s. kulkarni has touched upon several key issues in relation to media trials mainly dealing with: directions to prominent television networks to restrict reportage that could hamper the investigation, re interpretation of contempt law, and guidelines for the regulation the.
Hampering Judicial Independence Media Trials In India Its History And The trending topic in india at this moment is the phrase “media trial.”. a media trial is a popular expression referring to the media acting as judge, jury and executioner in news cases and declaring a verdict before the court passes its judgment. a media trial is often conducted in “parallel” alongside the police investigation. The strength and importance of media in a democracy is well recognized. article 19 (1) (a) of the indian constitution, which gives freedom of speech and expression includes within its ambit, freedom of press. the existence of a free, independent and powerful media is the cornerstone of a democracy, especially of a highly mixed society like india. Media trials within india's criminal justice system. media trial refers to the phenomenon where media outlets, through their coverage and commentary, influence public perception of a criminal case before it is adjudicated in court. this paper explores the ethical, legal, and social implications of media trials, analyzing their impact. Contributed to the emergence of media trials in india. the importance of this subject matter is rooted in the possible ramifications of media trials on the impartiality and soundness of the legal system. the preconceived notion of an accused individual's guilt by the media can result in prejudiced public opinions, jeopardize the.
Comments are closed.