Media Trials In India Complete Legal Analysis Freedom O The transgression of rights by media is in vogue these days, but media trials have been an age old issue. media always practices these in the garb of freedom. The strength and importance of media in a democracy is well recognized. article 19 (1) (a) of the indian constitution, which gives freedom of speech and expression includes within its ambit, freedom of press. the existence of a free, independent and powerful media is the cornerstone of a democracy, especially of a highly mixed society like india.
Seven Prominent Journalists Discuss Deteriorating Press Freedom In The press council of india act, constituted a body named press council of india. it is a statutory autonomous body. its object broadly was to preserve freedom of press. the council could warn, admonish, or censure a newspaper or a news agency for any professional misconduct, or breach of code of journalistic ethics, or offence against the. The unavailability of mindset of legislature to insert the effective statute and negation of supreme court to impose guidelines on media trials, uncertainty of implementing of law commission guidelines, the outcome of such approach and failure to tie jaws of uncontrolled media by government and court which harming rule of law in india. The controversy in the instant matter raises questions of contemporary importance touching upon the right of the press media to express views freely, the right of the deceased to be treated with respect and dignity after death, the need to ensure investigation of the crime to proceed on the right track without being unduly prejudiced by media reports based on “investigative journalism. In lic v. manubbai shah2, the supreme court reiterated that the freedom of speech and expression must be broadly construed to include the freedom to circulate one's views by word of mouth, or in writing, or through audio visual media. this includes the right to propagate one's views through the print or other media.
Media Trial And Their Legality E Justice India The controversy in the instant matter raises questions of contemporary importance touching upon the right of the press media to express views freely, the right of the deceased to be treated with respect and dignity after death, the need to ensure investigation of the crime to proceed on the right track without being unduly prejudiced by media reports based on “investigative journalism. In lic v. manubbai shah2, the supreme court reiterated that the freedom of speech and expression must be broadly construed to include the freedom to circulate one's views by word of mouth, or in writing, or through audio visual media. this includes the right to propagate one's views through the print or other media. The judgment pronounced by chief justice dipankar datta and justice g.s. kulkarni of the bombay high court walks on a tight rope navigating the line between the “freedom of the press” guaranteed under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution of india and the menace of media trials running contrary to the same constitution of india. but, in a larger scheme of questions does this case stand as a. 1. the press council, a statutory organization that was first founded in india to support democracy and free expression, fought to enact the press council act in 1978. 2. article 19 (1) (a) states that in order to maintain democratic principles and practices, individuals must have the freedom to express their thoughts and views in public. 3.
Comments are closed.