Artstation Norman Cavalry Alina Popovici Norman Knight Medieval I have long argued that 'norman' kite shields, as shown on bayeux tapestry, were more infantry than cavalry shields, but is this the final proof? 3 extra exc. The capital of the byzantine province of longobardia (comprising apulia and calabria), the city of bari, fell to duke robert guiscard, a norman military leader, in 1071 after a three year siege. now, in the words of anna comnena, guiscard “was always thinking out some more ambitious project.”. he would challenge the byzantine emperor.
Norman Shields Shields Weaponry Battle Merchant We Supply History This is not to say that the kite shield didn't make an excellent cavalry shield in the context of norman cavalry, or even that it was originally developed as an infantry shield. however, it does seem to have been very heavily associated with heavy infantry in the mid 10th century, while the byzantine cavalry still at least partially used round. And you'd be right, but the norman victory didn't come from the strength of a cavalry charge indeed the normans spent the best part of a day charging the english shield wall to very little effect. even norman sources such as guy of amiens carmen de hastingæ proelio admit that the english shieldwall successfully repulsed norman cavalry. The fighting lasted until dusk, the anglo saxon line still unbroken. why, then, does the myth of all conquering norman cavalry persist? romance of the mounted warrior. in the western way of war, victor davis hanson makes two points especially relevant to this question. the first is that medieval nobles were proud of their role as cavalry. The kite shield was especially vital during the famous battle of hastings in 1066. historical depictions, such as the bayeux tapestry, show norman knights wielding these shields, which played a crucial role in their victory against the anglo saxons. cavalry tactics. the length of the norman shield proved useful for mounted combat.
Comments are closed.